-
1.
Influence of methyl donor nutrients as epigenetic regulators in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of observational studies.
Chávez-Hidalgo, LP, Martín-Fernández-de-Labastida, S, M de Pancorbo, M, Arroyo-Izaga, M
World journal of gastroenterology. 2023;29(7):1219-1234
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent type of cancer and yet has the second highest mortality rate in cancer patients worldwide. Hence there is an urgency to understand more about dietary and lifestyle factors that can help to prevent this type of cancer. It is known that folate has a preventive function in CRC, possibly due to its role in DNA methylation. Methylation is the addition of methyl groups to DNA, which influences gene expression and regulation. This systematic review investigated how folate and other dietary methyl groups and methyl influencers such as B vitamins and alcohol influence the development of CRC, whilst also considering various genetic variants in methyl-metabolising enzymes (polymorphisms). The analysis included a total of 19 case-control and cohort studies and highlighted that potential interactions between methyl donor nutrients, genetic variants, and alcohol influence CRC risk. For most, high levels of folate intake were considered a protective factor, while high alcohol consumption proved to be a risk factor. Yet these interactions appear to be complex, with gender, genetic variations and folate status appearing to contribute to variable and, in some cases, contradictory outcomes. The authors suggested in their findings that Vitamin B6, Vitamin B3 (Niacin), and alcohol may affect CRC by influencing its risk by acting on both the genetic code itself and the epigenetic factors that control gene activity. Further research is needed to better understand the complexity of these mechanisms, and to help clarify the influence of methyl group donors as epigenetic regulators of gene activity in CRC development.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dietary methyl donors might influence DNA methylation during carcinogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, whether the influence of methyl donor intake is modified by polymorphisms in such epigenetic regulators is still unclear. AIM: To improve the current understanding of the molecular basis of CRC. METHODS A literature search in the Medline database, Reference Citation Analysis (https:// www.referencecitationanalysis.com/), and manual reference screening were performed to identify observational studies published from inception to May 2022. RESULTS A total of fourteen case-control studies and five cohort studies were identified. These studies included information on dietary methyl donors, dietary components that potentially modulate the bioavailability of methyl groups, genetic variants of methyl metabolizing enzymes, and/or markers of CpG island methylator phenotype and/or microsatellite instability, and their possible interactions on CRC risk. CONCLUSION Several studies have suggested interactions between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms, methyl donor nutrients (such as folate) and alcohol on CRC risk. Moreover, vitamin B6, niacin, and alcohol may affect CRC risk through not only genetic but also epigenetic regulation. Identification of specific mechanisms in these interactions associated with CRC may assist in developing targeted prevention strategies for individuals at the highest risk of developing CRC.
-
2.
Association of Retinol and Carotenoids Content in Diet and Serum With Risk for Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
Han, X, Zhao, R, Zhang, G, Jiao, Y, Wang, Y, Wang, D, Cai, H
Frontiers in nutrition. 2022;9:918777
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The incident rate of malignant tumours has been increasing, and so has colo-rectal cancer (CRC), which is now the third most frequent cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death. CRC development is influenced by environmental and genetic factors. Diet, diabetes, obesity, lack of physical activity, age, family history and history of benign adenomatous polyps and inflammatory bowel disease are all known risk factors. Modulating diet is one way to modify cancer risk. Vitamin A (retinol) and carotenoids, which are precursors to Vitamin A, are indispensable in the human body and widely occur in a range of vegetables, fruits and animal-derived foods. In some studies high dietary intake of retinol and carotenoids had been linked to a decreased risk of CRC, however, this was not consistent in all findings. To get a better understanding of this matter, the authors of this meta-analysis analysed 22 clinical studies from the last 20 years. The authors found an inverse association with carotenoids in blood serum, so higher blood serum of carotenoids seemed to decrease CRC risk. In regards to dietary intake, total carotenoid intake did not increase CRC risk and in fact the carotenoids carotenes, lycopene, and β-cryptoxanthin reduced risk, which was particularly noticeable in men. In women, high dietary intake of retinol also showed to reduce CRC risk, but it appeared to increase the risk in men. This raised the idea of gender-specific differences. Of clinical relevance are that carotenoids can be an important dietary contributors in reducing CRC risk. However the protective role of retinol appears to be gender-specific and only seems to benefit women, with the opposite effect in men.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
The results of this study were mixed:
- Total dietary intake of carotenoids was not associated with CRC risk.
- Case control studies found that high serum carotenoids may increase CRC risk.
- There were differences in findings between males and females.
- Larger, well-controlled studies over long time frames are needed to further explore the relationship between dietary intake and serum concentrations of carotenoids and retinol with CRC. These studies should include results by sex, race and dose response.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, and second in terms of mortality. Diet and environmental factors may have a strong influence and causative effect. Research has linked dietary consumption and serum levels of carotenoids and retinol with CRC. However, results have been mixed.
The aim of this meta analysis was to identify a potential association between CRC and carotenoid and retinol intake. A total of 22 cohort and case control studies published between 2000-2019 from across Europe, North America and Asia were included. The number of CRC cases totalled 19,293 from a sample of more than 450,000 people.
Eligible studies reported data in either relative risk (RR) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In the meta analysis, data were combined and expressed as OR with 95% CI.
Cases and control groups were based on high or low carotenoid intake as defined by the included studies and based on dietary intake or serum concentration. Sub-group analysis was undertaken by study type, sex and tumour type. A sensitivity analysis tested the robustness of the results.
Due to the heterogeneity between studies, adjustments were made for potential covariates and confounding factors including age, gender, a family history of CRC, smoking, alcohol consumption and levels of physical activity.
The quality of the studies was assessed against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and scored using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
The nutrients studied included; beta-carotene, alpha-carotene, lycopene, lutein/zeaxanthin, beta-cryptoxanthin and retinol. These were assessed through dietary intake or serum concentrations.
Key Findings
- High dietary intake of beta-carotene was not associated with an increased risk of CRC in females (OR = 0.97; 95%CI 0.79-1.19), however, it may lower CRC risk in males (OR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.55-0.99).
- High dietary intake of retinol was not associated with CRC risk (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.89-1.10). However, the findings suggested that it may reduce CRC risk in females but increase CRC risk in males.
- There was a tendency towards a slightly decreased risk of CRC with high dietary intakes of alpha-carotene), lycopene, and beta-cryptoxanthin. The results were more pronounced in males.
- No association was found between high consumption of high lutein/zeaxanthin, retinol or total carotenoids and the risk of CRC
- Case control studies found a negative association between serum carotenoids and CRC risk. This relationship was not found in cohort studies and therefore remains uncertain.
Conclusions
This was a well-conducted meta-analysis that was not subject to any conflicts of interest. Larger, well controlled prospective studies adjusting for sex and with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the relationship between dietary intake and serum levels of carotenoids and CRC.
Notes: The authors had no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Clinical practice applications:
- Healthcare practitioners working with people with a family history of CRC or those who may be at increased risk may like to consider increasing carotenoid intake modestly.
- A modest increase in dietary intake of beta-carotene for males may be beneficial.
- A modest increase in dietary retinol may be beneficial for females.
Considerations for future research:
- Further research is needed to explore the differences between sexes for dietary intake of carotenoids and retinol and CRC risk
- Further studies are needed to investigate the relationship between serum carotenoids and CRC
- Analysis of results by race and continent may be beneficial
- Further research is needed to define dose response
- Due to heterogeneity between studies, large, well controlled studies over long time frames are needed
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk is linked to serum and dietary retinol and carotenoids, according to clinical and epidemiological research. However, the findings are not consistent. As a result, we did this meta-analysis to determine the link between them. Methods: From 2000 through 2022, the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, as well as pertinent article references, were searched and filtered based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and literature quality ratings. High and low intake were used as controls, and OR (odds ratio) or RR (relative risk) and 95% confidence interval were extracted. The extracted data were plotted and analyzed using Stata12.0 software. Results: A total of 22 relevant studies were included, including 18 studies related to diet and 4 studies related to serum. For high and low intake or concentration controls, the pooled OR was as follows: β-carotene (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.78-1.03), α-carotene (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.72-1.03), lycopene (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.81-1.07), lutein/zeaxanthin (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87-1.07), β-cryptoxanthin (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.48-1.01), total carotenoids (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.81-1.15), retinol (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.89-1.10), serum carotenoids (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.93), serum retinol (OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.26-1.49). Subgroup analysis was performed according to tumor type, study type and sex. Conclusion: Total carotenoid intake and Lutein/Zeaxanthin intake were not associated with CRC risk. High β-carotene, α-carotene, lycopene, and β-cryptoxanthin all tended to reduce CRC risk. Serum carotenoid concentrations were significantly inversely associated with CRC risk.
-
3.
Mycotoxin-Linked Mutations and Cancer Risk: A Global Health Issue.
Ekwomadu, T, Mwanza, M, Musekiwa, A
International journal of environmental research and public health. 2022;19(13)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Mycotoxins are toxic substances produced by fungi, which can be found in common foods like maize, wheat, nuts, and foods containing them. Mycotoxins such as aflatoxins, ochratoxin, fumonisins, zearalenone, and some Penicillium toxins can alter genetic material. According to previous studies, they can damage genetic material and affect cell growth. Usage of chemicals such as fertilizers and fungicides is a common practice in the agricultural industry to protect plants from fungus and to feed them. However, fungicides can accelerate mycotoxin production. 16 studies were included in this Systematic Review and 11 in Meta-Analysis. This research looked at the harmful effects of mycotoxins such as aflatoxins, fumonisins, ochratoxin, T2, zearalenone, and some Penicillium toxins in causing cancers. The researchers evaluated the link between aflatoxin exposure and liver cancer, fumonisin B1 exposure and liver cancer, zearalenone exposure and breast cancer, zearalenone exposure and cervical cancer, citrinine and patulin exposure and colorectal cancer, and NEO, HT-2, and T-2 exposure and Oesophageal cancer. This research did not show significant associations between various mycotoxins and cancer risk. As currently, most studies are primarily focused on aflatoxin; more robust studies are needed to assess the cancer risk associated with different mycotoxin exposure. Using the results of this study, healthcare professionals can gain a better understanding of how mycotoxins affect our bodies.
Abstract
Humans continue to be constantly exposed to mycotoxins, mainly through oral exposure (dietary), inhalation, or dermal contact. Recently, it has been of increasing interest to investigate mycotoxin-linked carcinogenicity. This systematic review was conducted to synthesize evidence of the association between mycotoxin-linked mutations and the risk of cancer, to provide an overview of the data linking exposure to different mycotoxins with human cancer risk, and to provide an update on current research on the risk of cancer associated with human exposure to mycotoxins. PRISMA guidelines were used when conducting the systematic review. PubMed, MEDLINE, and CINAHL electronic databases were comprehensively searched to extract the relevant studies published from inception to May 2022. A total of sixteen relevant studies (4907 participants) were identified and included in this review. Of these, twelve studies were from Asia, while four of the studies were conducted in Africa. The overall meta-analysis result found no significant association, although some of the studies confirmed an association between mycotoxin-linked mutations and primary liver cancer risk. Mainly, the experimental studies have shown associations between mycotoxin-linked mutations and cancer risk, and there is a need for researchers to confirm these links in epidemiological studies in order to guide public health policies and interventions.
-
4.
Coffee Consumption and Cancer Risk: An Assessment of the Health Implications Based on Recent Knowledge.
Pauwels, EKJ, Volterrani, D
Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre. 2021;30(5):401-411
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coffee is one of the most consumed beverages worldwide. Coffee is a good source of polyphenolic antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compounds such as caffeine, cafestol, kahweol, and chlorogenic acids. This review included one hundred and five cohort studies and meta-analyses to evaluate the relationship between coffee consumption and cancer of the breast, liver, oesophagus, stomach, pancreas, colorectum, kidney, bladder, prostate, and ovaries. The results of this review found an inverse association between coffee consumption and reduced risk of hepatocellular cancer. A slight risk reduction is observed against breast cancer in postmenopausal women. This review found no considerable association between coffee consumption and decreased cancer risk in other organs. Further robust studies are required to investigate the benefits of coffee consumption on cancer risk reduction due to the high heterogeneity of included studies. However, healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the benefits of coffee consumption.
Abstract
A significant number of studies suggest that coffee consumption reduces cancer risk. This beneficial effect is usually ascribed to the presence of polyphenolic antioxidants and anti-inflammatory agents, including caffeine, cafestol, kahweol, and chlorogenic acids. To summarize recent literature on this subject, we performed a bibliographic search in PubMed and Embase over the period January 2005 to December 2020 to identify cohort studies and meta-analysis (with data collection ensuring quality of selected reports) that could provide quantitative data on the relationship between coffee consumption and common cancers. The totality of eligible scientific articles supports the evidence that coffee intake is inversely associated with risk of hepatocellular cancer and, to a slight extent, risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women. As to the association with other organs, including the esophagus, pancreas, colorectum, kidneys, bladder, ovaries, and prostate, the results are less clear as reports reveal conflicting results or statistically nonsignificant data. Therefore, this overview does not provide broad-based conclusions. Important uncertainties include general study design, inhomogeneous patient sampling, different statistical analysis (deliberate), misreporting of socioeconomic status, education, coffee-brewing methods, consumption of caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee, smoking habits, and alcohol intake. Clearly, more epidemiologic research needs to be conducted before solid science-based recommendations can be made with regard to coffee consumption.
-
5.
Yogurt, cultured fermented milk, and health: a systematic review.
Savaiano, DA, Hutkins, RW
Nutrition reviews. 2021;79(5):599-614
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Many fermented foods are associated with health benefits, including fermented dairy products. Whereby diary itself is part of many nutritional guidelines, the guidances rarely distinguish between dairy and fermented dairy. This qualitative, systematic review sought to capture how consumption of fermented milk products influences health. The review included 108 studies, with over 70% reporting beneficial health outcomes. A small number of studies reported insignificant or neutral results and four unfavourable ones. The aspects of health that were considered included lactose digestion and tolerance, gut health and disease, diarrhoea and constipation, irritable bowel syndrome, cardiovascular health and disease, hypertension, blood lipids, cancer risk, colorectal/breast/prostate cancer, weight and body composition, diabetes risk and metabolic syndrome and bone health. The authors concluded that eating fermented dairy products aided lactose digestion and showed a consistent link with reduced risk of breast and colorectal cancer, type 2 diabetes, and improved weight maintenance, cardiovascular, bone, and gastrointestinal health. As dairy appears to increase the risk for prostate cancer, fermented dairy seems to be no different here to unfermented dairy at increasing the risk. Some potential mechanisms are proposed in the discussion section, how fermented dairy may elicit its health benefits. Given the predominant health benefits of fermented dairy, the authors encouraged to include fermented dairy into national nutrition guidelines and stress distinction between dairy and fermented dairy products. This review captures current evidence of the widespread health benefits of fermented dairy consumption worthwhile considering in clinical practice. In the absence of more clear findings in relation to prostate cancer and prevention, a cautious approach to dairy and fermented dairy consumption may be warranted.
Abstract
Consumption of yogurt and other fermented products is associated with improved health outcomes. Although dairy consumption is included in most dietary guidelines, there have been few specific recommendations for yogurt and cultured dairy products. A qualitative systematic review was conducted to determine the effect of consumption of fermented milk products on gastrointestinal and cardiovascular health, cancer risk, weight management, diabetes and metabolic health, and bone density using PRISMA guidelines. English language papers in PubMed were searched, with no date restrictions. In total, 1057 abstracts were screened, of which 602 were excluded owing to lack of appropriate controls, potential biases, and experimental design issues. The remaining 455 papers were independently reviewed by both authors and 108 studies were included in the final review. The authors met regularly to concur, through consensus, on relevance, methods, findings, quality, and conclusions. The included studies were published between 1979 and 2017. From the 108 included studies, 76 reported a favorable outcome of fermented milks on health and 67 of these were considered to be positive or neutral quality according to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Quality Criteria Checklist. Of the 32 remaining studies, the study outcomes were either not significant (28) or unfavorable (4), and most studies (18) were of neutral quality. A causal relationship exists between lactose digestion and tolerance and yogurt consumption, and consistent associations exist between fermented milk consumption and reduced risk of breast and colorectal cancer and type 2 diabetes, improved weight maintenance, and improved cardiovascular, bone, and gastrointestinal health. Further, an association exists between prostate cancer occurrence and dairy product consumption in general, with no difference between fermented and unfermented products. This article argues that yogurt and other fermented milk products provide favorable health outcomes beyond the milk from which these products are made and that consumption of these products should be encouraged as part of national dietary guidelines. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42017068953.
-
6.
An updated systematic review and meta-analysis on adherence to mediterranean diet and risk of cancer.
Morze, J, Danielewicz, A, Przybyłowicz, K, Zeng, H, Hoffmann, G, Schwingshackl, L
European journal of nutrition. 2021;60(3):1561-1586
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
The development of cancer is associated with a number of risk factors, including smoking, obesity, sedentary lifestyles, alcohol consumption, infections, pollution, and dietary imbalances. Based on previous research, optimal consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, along with reduced consumption of red and processed meat, reduces cancer risk. According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with lower cancer mortality and site-specific cancer development. A Mediterranean diet includes fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes, fish, whole grains, extra virgin olive oil, and low amounts of red meat, processed meat, egg, and dairy, along with moderate amounts of red wine. According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, adherence to the Mediterranean diet reduces the risk of cancer mortality and the risk of developing cancers specific to the site, such as colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, gastric cancer, and lung cancer. Among the components of the Mediterranean diet, fruits, vegetables, and whole grains have been shown to reduce cancer risk. Bioactive substances found in Mediterranean diet components require additional robust studies to evaluate their benefits. A healthcare professional can use the results of this study to make clinical decisions and recommend therapeutic interventions to cancer patients.
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of current systematic review was to update the body of evidence on associations between adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) and risk of cancer mortality, site-specific cancer in the general population; all-cause, and cancer mortality as well as cancer reoccurrence among cancer survivors. METHODS A literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control and cohort studies published up to April 2020 was performed using PubMed and Scopus. Study-specific risk estimates for the highest versus lowest adherence to the MedDiet category were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence from cohort studies and RCTs was evaluated using the NutriGrade scoring system. RESULTS The updated search revealed 44 studies not identified in the previous review. Altogether, 117 studies including 3,202,496 participants were enclosed for meta-analysis. The highest adherence to MedDiet was inversely associated with cancer mortality (RRcohort: 0.87, 95% CI 0.82, 0.92; N = 18 studies), all-cause mortality among cancer survivors (RRcohort: 0.75, 95% CI 0.66, 0.86; N = 8), breast (RRobservational: 0.94, 95% CI 0.90, 0.97; N = 23), colorectal (RRobservational: 0.83, 95% CI 0.76, 0.90; N = 17), head and neck (RRobservational: 0.56, 95% CI 0.44, 0.72; N = 9), respiratory (RRcohort: 0.84, 95% CI 0.76, 0.94; N = 5), gastric (RRobservational: 0.70, 95% CI 0.61, 0.80; N = 7), bladder (RRobservational: 0.87, 95% CI 0.76, 0.98; N = 4), and liver cancer (RRobservational: 0.64, 95% CI 0.54, 0.75; N = 4). Adhering to MedDiet did not modify risk of blood, esophageal, pancreatic and prostate cancer risk. CONCLUSION In conclusion, our results suggest that highest adherence to the MedDiet was related to lower risk of cancer mortality in the general population, and all-cause mortality among cancer survivors as well as colorectal, head and neck, respiratory, gastric, liver and bladder cancer risks. Moderate certainty of evidence from cohort studies suggest an inverse association for cancer mortality and colorectal cancer, but most of the comparisons were rated as low or very low certainty of evidence.
-
7.
Association of Frequency of Organic Food Consumption With Cancer Risk: Findings From the NutriNet-Santé Prospective Cohort Study.
Baudry, J, Assmann, KE, Touvier, M, Allès, B, Seconda, L, Latino-Martel, P, Ezzedine, K, Galan, P, Hercberg, S, Lairon, D, et al
JAMA internal medicine. 2018;178(12):1597-1606
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Cancer has several risk factors for its development including the presence of pesticides in the environment. Organic foods arguably have less pesticides than conventionally grown produce and the consumption of these should therefore lower an individuals chance of developing cancer. However, very few studies exist looking at this association. This observational study of 68946 individuals aimed to determine the association between organic food intake and cancer risk. The results showed that the most prevalent cancers were breast, prostate and skin cancer and an increased consumption of organic food, lowered the risk for the development of cancer. It was concluded that a higher intake of organic foods could reduce the risk of developing cancer, however further studies are warranted to investigate initial findings. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that a diet rich in organic food could be of benefit for the prevention of cancer, however further studies are required before firm recommendations can be made.
Abstract
Importance: Although organic foods are less likely to contain pesticide residues than conventional foods, few studies have examined the association of organic food consumption with cancer risk. Objective: To prospectively investigate the association between organic food consumption and the risk of cancer in a large cohort of French adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this population-based prospective cohort study among French adult volunteers, data were included from participants with available information on organic food consumption frequency and dietary intake. For 16 products, participants reported their consumption frequency of labeled organic foods (never, occasionally, or most of the time). An organic food score was then computed (range, 0-32 points). The follow-up dates were May 10, 2009, to November 30, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: This study estimated the risk of cancer in association with the organic food score (modeled as quartiles) using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for potential cancer risk factors. Results: Among 68 946 participants (78.0% female; mean [SD] age at baseline, 44.2 [14.5] years), 1340 first incident cancer cases were identified during follow-up, with the most prevalent being 459 breast cancers, 180 prostate cancers, 135 skin cancers, 99 colorectal cancers, 47 non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and 15 other lymphomas. High organic food scores were inversely associated with the overall risk of cancer (hazard ratio for quartile 4 vs quartile 1, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.88; P for trend = .001; absolute risk reduction, 0.6%; hazard ratio for a 5-point increase, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96). Conclusions and Relevance: A higher frequency of organic food consumption was associated with a reduced risk of cancer. If these findings are confirmed, further research is necessary to determine the underlying factors involved in this association.
-
8.
Adolescent diet and subsequent serum hormones, breast density, and bone mineral density in young women: results of the Dietary Intervention Study in Children follow-up study.
Dorgan, JF, Liu, L, Klifa, C, Hylton, N, Shepherd, JA, Stanczyk, FZ, Snetselaar, LG, Van Horn, L, Stevens, VJ, Robson, A, et al
Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2010;19(6):1545-56
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Population and animal studies suggest that fat in the diet may have an influence on the development of breast cancer, but the results of studies in humans are inconsistent. This randomised controlled trial aimed to determine the effects of a lower-fat diet during childhood and adolescence on markers associated with breast cancer risk in adults. Female participants were initially recruited at age 8-10 years old, as part of a study to test the effects of lower-fat diets on cholesterol levels in children. The study diet limited total fat intake to 28% of calories (<8% saturated fat, <9% polyunsaturated fat, remainder monounsaturated), cholesterol was limited to 150mg/day and consumption of fibre was encouraged. The children followed the diet for 7 years, when the trial was terminated. This follow-up study was conducted 9 years later, when the participants were aged 25 to 29 years old. After adjusting for current diet, the lower-fat diet group had significantly higher oestradiol levels and bone mineral density. Progesterone concentrations and breast density did not differ between the two groups. The authors concluded that consumption of a lower-fat diet during adolescence does not appear to affect factors associated with breast cancer risk. Current diet may be more important than adolescent diet in determining hormone levels in premenopausal women.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescent diet is hypothesized to influence breast cancer risk. We evaluated the long-term effects of an intervention to lower fat intake among adolescent girls on biomarkers that are related to breast cancer risk in adults. METHODS A follow-up study was conducted on 230 girls who participated in the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC), in which healthy, prepubertal, 8 to 10 year olds were randomly assigned to usual care or to a behavioral intervention that promoted a reduced fat diet. Participants were 25 to 29 years old at follow-up visits. All tests of statistical significance are two-sided. RESULTS In analyses that did not take account of diet at the time of the follow-up visit, the only statistically significant treatment group difference was higher bone mineral content in intervention group participants compared with usual care group participants; their mean bone mineral contents were 2,444 and 2,377 g, respectively. After adjustment for current diet, the intervention group also had statistically significantly higher bone mineral density and luteal phase serum estradiol concentrations. Serum progesterone concentrations and breast density did not differ by treatment group in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS Results do not support the hypothesis that consumption of a lower fat diet during adolescence reduces breast cancer risk via effects on subsequent serum estradiol and progesterone levels, breast density, or bone mineral density. It remains unclear, however, if the results are specific to the DISC intervention or are more broadly applicable. IMPACT Modest reductions in fat intake during adolescence are unlikely to lower later breast cancer risk via long-term effects on the biomarkers measured.